Angkor ‘copy’ raises ire

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has taken its concerns over a large-scale “copy” of Angkor Wat to be built in Bihar, India – first mooted to a firestorm of controversy in 2012 – directly to the Indian government, asking it to intervene and put a halt to the project.

In a letter sent Saturday to India’s Ministry of External Affairs, the government appealed to India to act in order to maintain “historical” diplomatic ties between the two countries.

“The Royal Government of Cambodia considers that this copy of Angkor Wat temple [built] for commercial benefit seriously violates [its] world heritage, which is a universal and exceptional value of humanity,” the letter states.

It continued: “[The Cambodian government] strongly requests that India’s Ministry of External Affairs … reconsiders the planned construction of the Angkor Wat replica in order to preserve the traditional historic relations between the two countries and our people.”

The letter added that the imagery associated with Angkor Wat has been a defining characteristic of Cambodia’s image for centuries, and is even the central design element of the country’s national flag.

The statement was issued after the Cambodian government received a report that the Mahavir Mandir Trust is moving forward with plans to construct the Viraat Ramayan Mandir, a massive Hindu temple complex with striking similarities to Angkor Wat, Cambodia’s most famous and valuable tourist attraction.

Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts Secretary of State Thai Norak Satya yesterday voiced his concern over the potential commercial effect the copy may have for Cambodia.

“I think that the replica temple doesn’t have as much value as our Angkor Wat temple – it’s a listed [UNESCO] World Heritage Site since 1992. It belongs to the people of the world, including India,” he said. “What’s concerning is the commercial effect. People who don’t have money [for travel] will go see the replica temple. But I think many people will still come to see the real temple.”

Speaking to the Post yesterday, Kishore Kunal, who heads the Mahavir Mandir Trust, assured that his company was not creating a replica of Angkor Wat, saying that Cambodia’s famous complex was simply a source of inspiration for the new temple.

“We are using only the architecture of the spire as inspiration,” he said. “Inspiration is also being taken from other temples across India.”

But Kunal added that he has consulted with Cambodian authorities to determine whether or not his temple, which will upon completion be the world’s largest religious monument, is in fact an exact reproduction of Angkor Wat.

“We have asked Cambodia to send architects to see the plans and decide if it’s a replica,” he said.

“They will realise that it’s an improved version of many temples, including Angkor Wat, the Hanuman temple in Mahabalipuram in Tamil Nadu, India, and others.”

Kunal added that there is technically no rule against replicating a World Heritage Site, saying that India’s neighbour Bangladesh hosts a replica of India’s iconic Taj Mahal to no one’s apparent dissatisfaction.

“Angkor Wat was a temple [devoted] to the Hindu god Vishnu,” he said. “But our temple will have many Hindu gods, such as Shiva, Ram – an avatar of Vishnu – Hanuman, Ganesh and Vishnu as well.”

Meanwhile, Anne Lemaistre, the head of UNESCO’s Cambodia office, was confident that the Indian replica would “never replace the original Angkor Wat’s authenticity”.

Read More

Understand Bhutan & Survival Guide

I think it is time to put travel to Bhutan into some kind of perspective. During my three week travel to this idyllic country I discovered the place is not all it is hyped up to be. Value for money is extremely poor. Furthermore, service is terrible and there is little understanding of the desires of tourists.

One huge problem is the setup of the entire tourist industry ; tourist agencies book your hotels and restaurants so that there is no true consumer competition between establishments and the places most likely to profit are either those that either offer the guides best service or are the cheapest. Although there is no lack of staff in restaurants, hotels and museums, there are often few people actually working. One of many examples of this is the widespread habit of all meals being buffet based. If you are paying $250 per day and are clearly paying enough staff, I think it is reasonable to expect more than this, especially as there are usually only 5 dishes anyway so for a table of people it is really not a lot of hassle to serve warm fresh dishes instead of luck warm self service. There were many more examples of poor service for example; our three week trip started at the airport in Parowith a luke-warm welcome from our guide who we discovered did not even know all of our names! In any other place in the world if you are spending $15000+ for a private guided tour for a group of 4 you would really expect the guide to be familiar with your names!

Some of my favourite scenes were a bunch of Bhutanese standing around in a museum with no clear role and one westerner busily working on the electrics. Clearly there was little interest to work or to learn in this scene. This is an attitude which is freely admitted by some Bhutanese we meet. Bhutanese are extremely proud people, although this characteristic is one great factor that has allowed them to preserve much of their cultural heritage it is also a huge barrier for development and prosperity of the country. Many of the physical labour jobs are not done by Bhutanese as people there look down on these vocations. For example, all of the road works and much of the building construction, electrics and plumbing is done by Indian labourers. Bhutanese people lack skilled work forces to do these jobs yet there is little interest to acquire these skills as they are looked down upon by Bhutanese.

I would argue there is something foul in a country where even the monks eat meat and yet no animals are butchered due to Buddhist beliefs. All meat you will be served will be imported from India, over terrible roads and without consistent cooling– I am neither a vegetarian or Buddhist or an animal rights fanatic but I can just imagine with disgust the condition where these animals are farmed and thus this setup is disturbing and hypocritical for numerous reasons.

Furthermore, people are a lot less interested/open to foreigners compared to other Asian countries, which is ridiculous when considering how important tourists are for this country. In reality you can do very little without your guide and their constant presence may limit contact with other locals. I found that the best experiences where the few times we managed to slip away from out guide and were invited to a local festival.

Do not go expecting to purchase any souvenirs as the quality is poor and items are overpriced to the point of insult. The best quality items are invariably those imported from India, Nepal or China- but there two are overpriced. Also be aware of always inquiring about prices before you make use if any service. We ended up paying over $40 for one load of laundry. When complaining about this cost the hotel staff wrote down how this cost was created by listing each item and its price individually. We had obviously thought it they would just charge a lump sum or one load of laundry and not over a dollar for each pair of underwear. This was in Bumthang and it is not reasonable that this cost twice what this service would have cost in New York, obviously the overheads are not comparable and there is plenty of labour available as there is no other industry.

We generally like to travel in a way that allows us to visit hospitals, schools and industry. The first two where readily accessible to us which is quite a positive, however, there is no real industry to speak of in Bhutan. We also always make a conscious effort to consume local produce (obviously our attempt of consuming local meat was a shot into the wind), one such product was Panda Beer however, this unfortunately was actually run by a Swiss man who immigrated to Bumthang, and therefore less Bhutanese that expected.

All in all I recommend you reconsider spending your hard earned money on this trip, however if you do decide to travel there avoid using the Bridge to Bhutan travel agency. Our guide was not good and the atmosphere he created was very negative. He chose some pretty bad restaurants and hotels and did not react to our preferences. The two brothers running this company seemed more capable than our guide however, although this is a quite a new company, in a start-up economy they do not find it necessary to take out tours personally. Anywhere else in the world people trying to run a small company would probably be more involved. Would not recommend this agency

Read More